FACT FILE
The following links provide information mostly concerning the
self-styled Orders. However such web sites need a timely warning.
For those who are truly Christian, one great sadness is the observed
hypercritical treatment toward self-styled Orders, which appears, only to
pay lip service to the teachings of our Lord, despite the first part of the
twin motto of the Order of St John, "Pro Fide, Pro Utilitate Hominum" (for
the faith). For example, to seek to belittle other societies which may be
fraternal organisations (as opposed to chivalric organisation of ancient
foundation), whose members are fellow Christians, is not within the spirit
of our Lord's teachings, and the teachings of St Paul. If (so-called) Christians
representing an organisation of ancient foundation hollow out the content
of the faith, then surely any claim to that ancient Christian heritage has
gone?
This matter of the Christian basis of the Order touches upon the complex
issue of legitimacy. Legitimacy, in the context of discussion on the various
Orders of St John can mean one, or more of four definitions; first, the
bona-fides of a group; second, that a provable link can be made to the Order
of St John preceding the Order's ejection from Malta in 1798; third, evidence
that the organisation acts within the hospitaller tradition, namely that
it is a Christian, and humanitarian organisation; fourth, the acceptance
by the State, or the international community of nations, as a recognised
Order of Chivalry. It is easy to forget the distinctions of meaning, and
to confuse the issues. When people write, or talk about an Order's legitimacy
- what do they mean?
In tracing the historic tradition of the Order of St John, in all
its forms and to examine the transmission of that tradition from generation
to generation, lineal descent is central to this evaluation. In this context
'tradition' seems a safer word to use, than 'legitimacy'. There is a simple
reason for this. Even where it is clear, that the discussion on legitimacy
is about lineal descent from the undivided Order, that discussion must be
prefaced with the warning that it is a very complex subject. Many of the
critics of the self styled Orders use legalistic formulæ, based on
mediæval or Roman Canon Law, or State Protocols from which to judge
those Orders. The assumption, of course, is that an elaborate code of
Franco-Latin feudal law is universally applicable. Despite the attempts to
act as this were true, it can be noted that as the monolithic culture in
which the historic Order of St John began its life no longer exists, there
may not be any final Court of Appeal!
One of the important features of any St John Order, ought to be a
humanitarian vocation. Even though some of the groups under review do not
have an historical pedigree, what is not lacking in a good number of
then is evidence of humanitarian endeavours, beyond the scope of this web
site to list. Those in desperate need and receiving such aid, will not be
worried about the issues of technical legitimacy. It is in this area of
humanitarian endeavours that all those organisation advancing such, must
be commended. The world needs more people in the service of others not less.
However historical claims to have any value
need to be true, and these web pages on the self-styled Orders seek to examine
and question the historic claims made, and to highlight those claims
which cannot stand up to academic scrutiny.
The polemic in some of the web sites dealing with the histories
of the self-styled Orders, on the links below, need to be filtered out, as
does the appeal to Franco-Latin feudal laws. However what is useful are the
historic details concerning the various self-styled Orders, some of which
are not preserved, or advertised by the "Orders" themselves, a few of which
are happy to re-write their histories, not so much by invented facts, but
by leaving out essential details which are not convenient to be included
and which would establish their true pedigree! It can be noted that some
websites run by these Orders disappear, only to re-emerge under another domain
name, with a new historical pedigree! |